News Article and Research Review


NewsArticle and Research Review

NewsArticle and Research Review

Thenews article provides information on the non-compliance of anesthesiaproviders to clean their hands during surgical procedures. The newsarticle reports on the research that found out the challenge theanesthesia providers face during surgical procedures. Medical NewsToday (2014) reports that a research by the Associationfor Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) thatfound out that anesthesia providers were less likely to clean handsbefore patient contact. The article further reports that completecompliance with the recommended hand hygiene in the non-operatingrooms take over 60 minutes available in an hour of anesthesia time(MedicalNews Today, 2014). The article concludes the reporting by pointingout that after-surgery infections are among the most commonhealthcare-associated infections.

Theoriginal research focuses on the research question was to explorewhether anesthesia providers complied with the guidelines for handhygiene to prevent healthcare-related infections. The research wasconducted at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and involved theanesthesia providers of the hospital (Rowlands et al, 2014). Themain methodology of the research is observation of the real actionsand procedures followed by the anesthesia providers. The researchused video recording for the observation of the behavior of themedics in terms of the hand hygiene and the cleanliness procedures.

Theresults of the study showed that there was a higher percentage of theHand hygiene opportunities, but with a very low rate of compliance.The anesthesia providers had only a mean of 2.9% compliance to theHand Hygiene as observed under the criteria by the World HealthOrganization (Rowlands et al, 2014). The implication of the findingsof this research to the public health is a concern about the level ofhygiene provided to patients. The findings also have significance tothe degree of caution taken by the anesthesia providers as apreventive measure for health care-related infections.


Thenews article and the actual research all report about the same healthcare concern and about the same results from the research. Whilereading both the news article and the actual research, it is clearthat both communicate the need for understanding the status of thehygiene in the Anastasia procedures.

Thedifference between the news article and the original research is thedepth of the details covered by each of the two. In the article, thewriter included the necessary content of the research and theresults. The news article also provides a brief of the populationinvolved and a summary of the methodology. However, the originalresearch provides all the contents of a research and all the data ofthe observation. Consequently, the original research provides theresults and the analysis of the resultant data. This makes theoriginal research more distinctive and a viable source for the newsarticles to cite in their reporting.

Thisexplains why the news article for this topic regularly cited andreferenced the original research in its argument and report. Thismakes the news article more reliable by increasing its quality. Theintended readers of the news article are the public, especiallypeople who would want to keep up with the current affairs in themedical field. On the other hand, the audience for the peer-reviewedresearch article is medical professionals, institutions, and newsorganizations who cite them for their work. The takeaway message forboth the news article and the peer-reviewed article is the need forHand Hygiene compliance of the anesthesia providers to prevent toprevent health care-associated infection.


MedicalNews Today, 2014. Studyfinds low hand hygiene compliance rates during anesthesiaadministration. RetrievedFrom, &lt 5, 2014

Rowlands,J. (2014). Videoobservation to map hand contact and bacterial transmission inoperating rooms.Retrieved From,&lt 5, 2014