RESEARCH PAPER ANALYSIS 4
Theresearch article provides the study of the effect of Beta-Alanine ina well laid outline and presentation method. The research seeks aninvestigation of the effect of the two supplements on the rowingexercise, a task that uses muscular physiology. The studyinvestigates the effect of beta-alanine alone on the performance onone side, and the effect of beta-alanine with sodium bicarbonate onthe other. The study involved the use of twenty professional rowerswith insignificant differences. Their age raged 23 ± 4 years, heightof 1.85 and body mass of 82.5 with variation limits of 8.9 kg. Thekey elements of the research methodology are well illustrated withcomplete purpose of the study, methodology, experimental design, dataanalysis, results and conclusion.
Thepurpose of the research is well illustrated and clearly pointed out.In a statement that defines the study being explored, the articleprovides a brief description of the investigation as well as theexpected outcomes. However, the article does not give comprehensivebackground information that necessitates the exploration of theresearch question. The article provides the purpose of the researchwithout exploring the factors that necessitate the study. In researchmethodology, the background information on a study provides theunderstanding of the variables being explored by the procedures andanalysis. This understanding provides the rationale for thehypothesis that is adapted in the research.
Theresearch does not provide conclusive contexts, that the research isbased on. From the description of the study, it is clear that thestudy seeks to investigate the effect of the two reagents on a 200-mrowing performance. According to the scientific research standards, aresearch study needs to describe the gap that the student wants tofill by exploring the factors around the context of the study. Thestudy needs to explore more knowledge regarding the production ofenergy during the rowing exercise that is under study. Therefore, theresearch needs to examine the context that will affect the rowingexercise such as the environment and other physiological factors.
Themethodology of the research is sufficient and provides the standardguidelines of scientific study. The research also outlines thepurpose of the study, the methodology adopted and the results of theinvestigation. According to the standard research methodologies, aresearch exercise should have a methodology that is congruent to theinvestigation. This enables the researchers to focus on the objectiveand select the right procedures of achieving the research purpose.This requirement is well observed in this study as described in thearticle. Moreover, the conclusion of the study is well illustratedand is in line with a clear reference to the objective of the study.
Theexperimental design of the study is optimum to the researchmethodology adopted and provides an appropriate procedure. This isbecause the experimental design involves the 30 rowers undergoingcontrolled tests with a clear record of their characteristics. Theywere introduced to the supplementation that had the beta-alanine. Theefficiency of their performance was measured under the experimentsand comparison with their capacity performance as per the experiment.However, the research notes that the efficacy of beta-alanine is notwell investigated using appropriate exercises. However, the researchacknowledges that there is evidence suggesting the significance ofthe sodium bicarbonate and beta-alanine supplementation on muscleperformance.
Thefindings of the research are consistent with the experimental purposeand the variables under investigation. The research found out alikely positive effect of beta-alanine on the performance of therowers. However, the findings did not point out the exact positiveeffect of the supplement on the performance. The only value that theresearch suggests is a 96% likelihood of a positive effect, withouteven giving a value of possible confidence levels that the 96% chancewill be observed. In addition, the study compares this effect to thatof beta-alanine with sodium bicarbonate, where the latter has a 87%likelihood of positive effect. In the two cases, the study allocatesvariances of the differences in the outcome percentage of likelihood.
Themain strengths of the study are the adherence to research methodologyand the use of optimum variables. The comparison of the effect of theBeta-Alanine supplementations with and Without Sodium Bicarbonateconstitutes an appropriate study. In addition, the study consultsprevious studies on the topic and previous knowledge through a wellexplained literature review. Despite not indicating the review in adistinct section, the knowledge shared and studied is sufficient tosupport the assumptions and arguments of the researchers.
Ingeneral, the study has an optimum research standard. However, thestudy lacks conclusive contexts, that describe the physiologicaldifferences of the rowers used in the study. In addition, the studylacks comprehensive background information that creates anunderstanding of the rationale behind the research. Moreover, theresearch makes some assumptions that leave a gap in the investigationof the variables, such as the efficacy of the beta-alaninesupplementation in the case of the application of appropriateexercise tests on performance.